TKENTEC - ACMBRHyDAF

Unlike the existing MBR method, cleaning is possible without a separate lifting device and the cleaning time is short.
(Installation cost is cheaper than the existing MBR method, construction time is shortened and maintenance is easy.)
It can be installed in the old biological treatment system without additional civil engineering work.
Since the washing water is circulated and cleaned automatically, the washing efficiency is improved and the life of the membrane is long.
As it is installed separately, rather than installed in an aeration tank, like the MBR method, it is possible to prevent sludge bulking and loss of sludge caused by PIN-FLOC and to ensure stable water quality.
Independent nutrients such as nitric acid bacteria can be maintained at high concentrations, so it is efficient for nitrification process and can operate at low FM ratio.

Sortation	ACMBR method	Long-term Ppyrotechnics	Contact oxidation method
Advantage	Very little site requirements No need for return sludge equipment Very little sludge Excellent response to load fluctuations Low maintenance cost No sludge bulking concept Excellent treatment water quality	Expect high processing efficiency with easy operation Long-term aeration causes little excess sludge. Stabilized treated water Suitable for small and small treatment plants	Long time to trap sludge High biochemical stability Reduce the amount of surplus sludge Special response in low concentrations of sewage and low load conditions Small area
Disadvantages	Regular cleaning required	Long term aeration to increase scale Sludge return require Maintenance cost is high	Difficulty controlling attached organisms Requires contact material High dependence on universal structure Settling tank required for actual operation Rapid deterioration of water quality if anaerobic occurs and detached during long-term operation inside attached microorganisms